CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF IMPARTIALITY IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

The article is devoted to the essence of principle impartiality a judge in court proceedings as separate element right fair trial, defined by number national and international law provisions. It substantiated that context significant impact European Court Human Rights on implementation judicial Ukraine, consideration certain areas its practice particularly relevant not only for understanding but also effective application court. study focuses subjective objective factors judge's impartiality, their relationship interaction. was revealed component lack internal convictions views judge, indicating his interest outcome case. has an external character manifested presence can influence when considering most are: or other close with participants participation same trial different capacity, possibility pressure judges, especially administration, authorities; officials whom career even her tenure may depend. This approach allows us speak connection independence, which much broader content, precisely ability freely objectively make decision A comparative analysis judges process, applied ECHR courts, differences. Thus, position slightest doubt about bias arise part burden proving absence lies providing sufficient data. In often grant request recusal if he considers it unfounded, so participant must prove validity doubts himself.